# Friday, November 14, 2008

Importing a class from the 'default package' (no package) - impossible

Did you know that classes in the 'default package' (classes that don't have a package) cannot be imported from classes that do have a package?

I did not know that.

Try it:




This is what javac says:

>javac Class1.java

>javac package2\Clazz2.java -cp .

package2\Clazz2.java:3: '.' expected
import Class1;
             ^
package2\Clazz2.java:3: ';' expected
import Class1;
              ^
2 errors


How stupid is this?
Is this why omitting package is deprecated?
# Thursday, November 13, 2008

Javac bug, Eclipse innocent, bug in static imports

I had an issue compiling some java classes. Javac failed, Eclipse's compiler worked. The issue is described here.
I was blaming Eclipse, I was blaming java6's endorsing. I was thinking it was due to JAXB.

It comes out they all were innocent.

Here's my code:

package f;

 

import static f.ProblematicClass.E1.E2.VALUE;

 

import javax.annotation.Resource;

 

public class ProblematicClass {

 

    @Resource

    public static enum E1 {

        F(VALUE);

 

        private E1( E2 requiredBankAccounts ) {

        }

 

        public static enum E2 {

            VALUE;

        }

    }

}


The result with javac is:
>javac f\ProblematicClass.java

f\ProblematicClass.java:9: cannot find symbol
symbol  : class Resource
location: class f.CorrectClass1
        @Resource
         ^
1 error


After some research I think I simplified the problem:
(If I continue to simplify it would still fail to compile but at some point it would start to compile which yesterday drove me crazy.
This is the most simplistic case that consistently fails to compile)

package f;

 

import static f.ProblematicClass.E1.VALUE;

import javax.annotation.Resource;

 

public class ProblematicClass {

 

      @Resource

      public static enum E1 {

            VALUE;

      }

}


All of these changes fix the compilation error (from javac):

...

// Reverse the order of imports

import javax.annotation.Resource;

import static f.ProblematicClass.E1.VALUE;

...

or

...
      // Use the FQN of the annotation

      @javax.annotation.Resource

      public static enum E1 {

            VALUE;

      }

...


This all makes me think that the static import fails the next one only if the next one is an annotation (I've tried with a java.util.Collection - it compiled).
I have tried this with jdk6u3 and jdk6u10.
I don't have jdk 1.5. Can someone test it on jdk 1.5?



Update: GRRRRRRRRRRRRRR, Somebody found it before me:
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6391197
It was reported on 27th of June, 2006 :'(

Here's what they say:

Workarounds:
1) switching the order of the import statements works (although they often get changed back by our development tools).
2) Commenting out the static import statements, then compiling, then putting the import statements back and
compiling again with the old classes still there also works. This means that the compiler errors happen at the strangest
of times
, and in large programs it can be very difficult to work out how to workaround the problems.

Weird javac case - Eclipse's compiler is wrong again.

I have some code.
I have two classes. They both have inner enums.
The two inner enums have an annotation.

But one of them does not compile. The other one compiles just fine.

In eclipse there's no error, but when I build the code from ant I get a compilation error - the annotation class is not found:

    [javac] ProblematicClass.java:147: cannot find symbol
    [javac] symbol  : class XmlType
    [javac] location: class package.ProblematicClass
    [javac]     @XmlType(name="fff")
    [javac]      ^
    [javac] 1 error

I spent some time looking for it - I thought that the classpath is wrong, I endorsed an updated version of the API (java 6). The issue persisted.

Then I decided to use javac directly:


javac -verbose -classpath lib\X.jar;lib\X2.jar -d bin -sourcepath src -encoding UTF-8 src\package\ProblematicClass.java

Strangely enough I got the same error?! Then I did the same for the class that did compile successfully using ant - it worked.
So there was a difference between the two classes and I had to find it.

And I found it, can you find it?